skip to page content
Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website
Publication Briefs

Study Develops Candidate Quality Measures for VA Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment


Improving healthcare is contingent upon having valid measures of quality; however, it is often difficult to translate and operationalize clinical evidence or treatment guidelines into a quality measure that predicts patient outcomes. For example, recent research found that VA's current substance use disorder (SUD) treatment quality measures are not positively associated with facility-level outcomes and only modestly related to patient-level outcomes in some patient subgroups. The goal of this study was to identify patterns of VA care that are associated with both facility- and patient-level outcomes in order to develop a new process-of-care measure for VA outpatient alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment quality. As part of this process, investigators sought to develop a list of candidate quality measures that could be operationalized, and to identify which quality measures had significant facility- and patient-level associations with outcomes. Quality measures included intensity and duration of care, as well as provider continuity. Outcome and process data were analyzed for 2701 VA patients who had started a new episode of care at 71 different VA (outpatient) SUD treatment programs from 2001-2003.

Findings show that nine candidate process measures of outpatient AUD treatment quality can predict facility-level and patient-level improvement. The candidate measures with the strongest association with improvement in outcomes focused on Veterans who received 3 to 6 outpatient visits in the first month of care. Results also showed that while the literature indicates that longer duration of care should produce better patient outcomes, the investigators found no such link with overall outcomes. The authors suggest that their "pre-validated" quality measures require additional steps, such as verifying the association between these measures and outcomes in other datasets, as well as having expert panels (e.g., policymakers, stakeholders) determine whether they make sense clinically and meet other design requirements.

PubMed Logo Harris A, Kivlahan D, Bowe T, Finney J, and Humphreys K. Developing and Validating Process Measures of Health Care Quality: An Application to Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment. Medical Care December 2009;47(12):1244-1250.

This study was funded by HSR&D. All authors except for Dr. Bowe are part of the VA/HSR&D Substance Use Disorders Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (SUD-QUERI). All authors except Dr. Kivlahan are part of HSR&D's Center for Health Care Evaluation in Palo Alto, CA.

Related Briefs

» next 136 Quality Briefs...


» next 62 Substance Use Briefs...


What are HSR Publication Briefs?

HSR requires notification by HSR-funded investigators about all articles accepted for publication. These journal articles are reviewed by HSR and publication briefs or summaries are written for a select number of articles that are then forwarded to VHA Central Office leadership to keep them informed about important findings or information. Articles to be summarized are selected by HSR based on timeliness of the findings, interest of leadership, or potential impact on the organization. Publication briefs are written for only a small number of HSR published articles. Visit the HSR citations database for a complete listing of HSR articles and presentations.


Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.